Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Presby Bloggers Unite on Guns


I was riding a big wheel in our family’s driveway. I would learn to ride a bike in the backyard later that summer, but on this hot day, I was still in the land of three wheels. My brother was outside with me, six years older, and probably watching me for our mother, who was inside with my three sisters.

The truck was a flatbed, at least in my memory. When it pulled into our driveway, my first reaction was annoyance as the large truck negatively impacted my big wheeling circuit. But I also remember the door of the truck opening, and seeing beer cans rattling around inside. In my mind’s eye, they were Budweiser cans. My brother went up to the man inside the truck, and the man asked for directions.

I don’t remember much else after that, except my brother and I went inside, as the man asked to speak with our mother. I remember being in my sisters’ bedroom, knowing everyone was upset, and seeing my brother in the hall.

Everything else about the story I only know from hearing it retold through the years. The man walked off a chain-gang crew a couple of days before. The truck was stolen. He had family in Georgia, and was trying to find them. He found us first, and after learning we were home alone, he talked his way into the house and confronted my mother.

And then my brother chased him away with an unloaded shotgun. My oldest sister slipped out the back door and ran to the neighbor’s house, so police arrived shortly thereafter.

My next direct memory of the event was later that night, when many of my aunts and cousins were in our house and my father, with a strange look about him even to my young eyes, was now home. The story was told and retold that night and in the years that followed, although I have never heard my brother speak of it in any detail even to this day.

This month’s Bloggers Unite topic is gun violence and gun control. It’s a personal issue for me, not only because of that frightening summer day, but also because I grew up around guns. I still remember the way my father’s shotgun smelled, how it looked when you opened it and stared down the twin barrels, and the slapping noise it made from far off in the woods when Pop took a shot. I still remember his smaller shotgun, the one he let me use, and the first rabbit I killed with it. I remember eating that rabbit after my mom prepared it with dumplings, and I remember feeling pride at my own usefulness in providing meat for our family. Even today, my own freezer has packages of deer meat supplied by my still-hunting father.

I also remember shooting a woodpecker with my pellet gun. No idea why I did it. The woodpecker didn’t die immediately, and I remember crying as I shot it at close range to try to get it to stop looking at me.

I give you all of this personal back-story because I now want to tell you something you may not expect from someone with my background:

I think we all need to get over our obsession with guns. Our jealous and preoccupation with guns is long past the flirting-with-idolatry stage. Its now more than just a fetish. Its now full-blown worship.

We’ve all seen the news stories about church shootings and home invasions and right to carry demonstrations. And we’ve all heard the arguments about the Second Amendment. In the end, we have to ask ourselves a couple of big questions. The first question is whether or not the widespread ownership of guns is making us any safer, or if it is somehow protecting some God-given freedom of ours in a unique way (other than the supposed right to own an AK-47). I would assert that we are not safer, and the statistics on accidental shootings versus self-defense successes support my position by a couple orders of magnitude.

The second question is more important, and almost seems to be contrary to the first. It is this: Will the Kingdom of God have firearms? If we answer no (and I think everyone who is being honest would answer the question in the negative) then our actions should be equally clear.

As the church we are tasked with living out the Kingdom as best we can. This may entail almsgiving, or prayer, or devotion to our fellow man, but it also involves vulnerability. This vulnerability, both to each other and to outside harms, is an imitation of Christ and an object lesson in trust. If we are truly vulnerable (go read the Sermon on the Mount right now if you’re confused about the necessity of vulnerability) then we will truly trust God and His grace for our well being. If, on the other hand, we trust only ourselves and our own ability to save our lives, then scripture says we are doomed to fail.

How is it possible for me to feel this way in light of my brother’s bravery? As an adult I know that we were lucky that day some thirty-plus years ago, and that the shotgun could have easily been taken away, leading to a much more violent outcome. And I’m also mindful of my sister and her bravery; as she ran next door to summon help. Help that came, albeit a few minutes later.

The reality is that the gun did not save us at all. It was God’s grace in our lives in the form of alert and responsible children, along with a stable family that provided guidance and inspired loyalty, that saved us all.

We would have survived without the gun. And the church could as well.

For more on this topic, see: PC(USA) - position on gun control.

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Where my Governor at? Where my Blog at?


So, many have asked me why the blog hasn't been updated in the last couple of weeks (just as many are asking where Governor Mark Sanford is these days).

The answer is that Sunday School at PPC is on hold for the summer, to return on September 6, 2009.

Rest assured that our Emmaus journey will continue, and that the blog will be updated during July and August. We will probably deviate for the summer months from the lectionary text meme however, and only post when the spirit moves . . . .

Saturday, June 6, 2009

Guns for God

I have been very troubled for the past week after the recent shooting at a Lutheran Church in Kansas. Apparently, a man walked into the church at the beginning of worship and killed Dr. George Tiller, who was serving as usher. The speculation is that the gunman killed Dr. Tiller because he disagreed with the doctor's work by providing abortions to women.
Unfortunately, these incidents seem to be on the rise. Last July, a man entered the Unitarian Universalist Church in Knoxville, Tennessee as the children were singing for the congregation. He opened fire and killed two people, wounding several others. Authorities say that the man was angered over the Unitarians' "liberal" stance on such issues as gay rights. In March 2009, a man entered First Baptist Church in Maryville, Illinois and shot the pastor during worship service. No motive has been attributed for this killing, but the man had several rounds of ammunition, leading authorities to believe that he had planned a mass murder.
In the midst of this climate, a pastor in Kentucky has proposed a "bring your weapons to church day" for his congregation. Church members will bring their guns, learn about gun safety, sing patriotic songs, and even have a chance at winning a free handgun from a raffle. According to the pastor, the United States would not exist without God or firearms, therefore, this worship service is a celebration of both.
I think you probably know that I strongly disagree with this pastor. I vehemently oppose any attempt to connect God with our human inclination towards fear and violence. Shouldn't our sanctuaries be just that - a sanctuary from the fears and divisions of the human world? Sure, we still have divisions within the church, but in worship we are supposed to rise above these and be reminded that we are one in Christ. Is it becoming a trend for some believers to take it upon themselves to administer God's judgment upon those with different beliefs?
I don't know the answers; I just know that these shootings sadden me. I will be praying for those congregations that have been victimized, and praying that the Kentucky congregation may hold their gun/worship service without incident.






Monday, June 1, 2009

Presbyterian Bloggers Unite

This month Presby Bloggers Unite is looking at the relationship between church and state. What, we are tasked with asking, are ways that we see our church and our country relating to each other for good, or for ill?

Calvin took a prosaic view on the subject. To him, civil government was a gift from God, and as such should be supported and promoted whenever possible. Church leaders should be civil leaders. Civil leaders should be leaders in church. The two entities were dispensations of God's love in our midst, and both deserved our support. He based this, in large part, on the teachings Paul as found in his Letter to the Romans.

Our view today is obviously different. Our post-Federalist Papers mindset argues that church and state should be separate, and to the extent that they overlap, they do so at their collective peril.

My own exposure to the church-state question is both personal and professional. First, in my professional capacity, I often attend governmental meetings. Here in the deep south, these gatherings always begin with a prayer. Years ago I noticed the obvious discomfort the leader of the prayer often experienced, based on some notion that the mention of Jesus during the prayer would bring a legion of ACLU militants to the door. This awkwardness invariably leads to a theologically nonsensical prayer, one that ends with the imponderable phrase "In Thy name we pray."

I've used "Trusting in Your grace and mercy" in public prayers, but so far this nondenominational denouement is not catching on in our public square.

Sometimes I want to yell "Oh for Jesus's sake!" at the end of these feeble public prayers.

This pet peeve to the side, I've also dealt with the personal side of the church-state tension. In our own community of faith, we've dealt with issues such as the proper celebration of national holidays in church, the appropriate way to pray for our troops, and even the proper display of the American flag.

The flag issue is a particularly thorny one. Many expect to see an American flag inside the sanctuary on Sunday, while many see it as distracting and borderline idolatrous. Compromises in some churches include flying the flag inside the sanctuary only during national holidays, or flying the flag on the church grounds but not inside the sanctuary at all. The discussions within our own church on this issue have been intense, personal, conversations that are hard to navigate without feelings of alienation and misunderstanding.

I remember one conversation I had with another member of our church years ago. This member, a senior member of our congregation who served in the military, could not understand my objection to displaying the flag in the sanctuary. To him, the flag was a reminder of all the sacrifices our soldiers have made throughout history to guarantee that we could worship together as we please. His position on the subject was almost tearful, and obviously heartfelt.


I found it difficult to respond to my veteran friend. I tried to point out that those very thoughts, the ones he felt so profoundly, were distracting him from the very purpose for which we were gathered, and I mumbled on about the need to emphasize the church as universal in this fractured age.

He was unimpressed (but gentle) in his response. "Ken, we fly the Christian flag too, so that should solve your problem, right?"

I extracted myself from the conversation, sadly aware of the chasm in our perspectives. To me, the Christian flag is an even worse representation of idolatry than having the American flag in the sanctuary. Think about it - it purports to be a universal christian banner, but isn't widely accepted outside the United States. Its arranged to mimic the design of the American flag, with a solid field in its upper corner. Its colors? You guessed it: red, white, and blue.

Its message? If you ask me, the message of the Christian flag is that Christ is an American.

A way forward? I don't have it. Too many people that I love and respect feel strongly that I'm a crackpot on the issue.

Maybe I should take Calvin's view and see it all (church, state, flags, etc) as God's grace in my life.


Friday, May 29, 2009

Pentecost . . . the End?

This Sunday we celebrate the ancient festival known as Pentecost. Pentecost, or "fiftieth day" commemorates the arrival of the Holy Spirit among the early church. You remember the story from Acts, where the disciples poor out of the upper room and begin preaching to all passer byes in languages that all the hearers could understand.
It is understood today as the beginning of the church, and the beginning of the work of the Holy Spirit among us.
So, here at PPC, we are commemorating this important beginning by . . . .end our Sunday school for the summer. The church is born today, see you next fall!
Actually, summer breaks coinciding with Pentecost is on an idiosyncrasy of the calendar this year, and so I'm overstating the case a bit.
Here on the blog, we will continue with our reflections and updates, but we will probably address issues that come up through the week instead of following the rigid lectionary schedule. Be sure to check back often, and participate when you feel led.
We will go back to our regular weekly schedule come Labor Day.

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Systemic Failure

Last night I watched Frontline on PBS, which was devoted to the recent collapse in the financial markets.  I was impressed (and somewhat DEpressed) by the interconnectedness of all of our financial and corporate entities.  It was this close relationship between seemingly widely divergent industries and markets that caused our current economic struggles.

It went something like this:  Speculation (read "get rich quick") in the real estate market coupled with deregulation of the financial services industry led to a secondary market in questionable mortgages.  This led to a increase in questionable loans, as now there was a ready market to buy these previously unattractive assets.  One of the companies that was heavily invested in these mortgage-backed securities was Bear Stearns.  Once Wall Street got a glimpse at Bear's portfolio, and its heavy mix of troubled assets, the traders voted with their bids, and Bear found itself with almost no value.  Employee stock accounts were now trading at $2.00 a share, when only days before they were in the $80.00 range or higher.

The government stepped in and forced JP Morgan Chase to buy Bear (and backed it with billions in federal dollars).  

Problem solved, right?

Um, no.  Turns out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were also top heavy in bad mortgages.  The government stepped in again, this time in the form of huge guarantees from the Federal Reserve.   But then the market noticed that Lehman Brothers was also addicted to bad mortgage money.  The government decided it had had enough, and didn't intervene with Lehman.

Lehman failed.  The markets plunged.  Credit evaporated.  Balance sheets became violently red overnight.  It was September 15, 2008, and strong companies like General Motors couldn't get a loan for one day because even the banks were out of money. 

You remember the rest of the story - huge billion dollar bailouts of the insurance industry giant AIG, automotive behemoths GM and Chrysler, and the entire banking industry.

Almost a trillion dollars went out the door of the federal reserve in the last quarter of 2008.

And the economy still tanked.

What does this have to do with us here on the eMMAUS road?  Well, one of the motivations for saving all of these troubled companies was the idea of systemic failure, that is, the fear that one company could collapse, and all of the companies invested in, and related to, it could collapse, and so on.  Its kind of a negative Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme situation.  All these companies failing would cause the whole economic system to collapse.

It strikes me that this situation is very much in keeping with our Reformed faith.  We believe that the "system" is broken inasmuch as our world is a fractured place that is not working the way it should.  We also believe that we are connected to each other both inside the church and in the world at large so that we all rise and fall together in the end.

Our scripture this week is another selection from the Gospel of John (John 17:6-19).  It is a difficult read (at least to me) and I struggled to find the point for awhile.  But ultimately it occured to me that Jesus is talking about how we are all connected - to Him, to each other, and to God.  

It is this interconnectedness that is the answer, I believe, to the systemic failure going on in our world.

How could our relationships change the seemingly insurmountable problems facing us?  What are your thoughts on this issue?


Thursday, May 14, 2009

One more thing . . .

Not to go back to last week's discussion, but the WWJT debate continues all around us.  You may remember last week we talked on the blog and in class about our views on torture, both as Americans and as followers of Jesus.  Needless to say, we had a good spirited discussion, and ended up with opinions on all sides.

Well, yesterday I came across this AP article that rehashes much of our in-class discussion.  Included is a quote from former presidential candidate Gary Bauer, who supports the view that Jesus would be allright with "enhanced interrogation techniques."  TV talking head Keith Olberman opined in response to Bauer during his "Worst Person in the World" segment last night, watch: